oakley fat cat midstream and downstream manufacturers must not create a monopoly

, IBM, COMPAQ, HP, DELL and other production and sales of finished computers.
Can not own own production CPU, herself chipsets own production motherboard, and then the production of computer alone to sell their own can produce their own part of, but certainly not all by his own production company does have a almost, like Apple, but you see his last bucket of the vast number of vendors of INTEL and support INTEL Corporation.?
The saying goes, Two heads are better, completely on my own a company that is not all fighting, after all, strength in numbers, not to mention the company do PC computers, stress is compatible with, the emphasis is on open standards, pay attention to is the support of many companies, settles like an assembly line one-stop vendor system only if we have to make money, markets, and the results can be bigger.
Unlimited technology to launch a 486 chip, you must find cooperation in support of the middle and lower reaches of manufacturers in foreign countries, off-the-shelf computer makers such as IBM, COMPAQ, HP, the DELL and so on,oakley fat cat, to find that their cooperation can be. But the domestic? China is now a Chinese computer company (Great Wall Computer Company), and only his right to production of PC computer, so how the line?
Understand the computer industry, people know that the upstream firms, midstream and downstream manufacturers must not create a monopoly, this will upstream manufacturers, in turn, will be affected by the middle and lower reaches of party control. Also take INTEL do for example, if the world is only IBM a production of PC computers, only IBM has the right to production, that IBM has not in turn can control the INTEL Corporation, do not even have the INTEL CPU and produce their own CPU, IBM company is not the ability.
People know to understand the computer industry, the upstream firms, midstream and downstream manufacturers must not form a monopoly, this will upstream manufacturers, in turn, will be subject to the control of the middle and lower reaches of manufacturers.
In general, the upstream firms there is the possibility of monopoly, but the middle and lower reaches of the company is not this the principle of the industrial system. It's like making the CPU INTEL company may monopoly the CPU chip market,north face dress, but for the computer finished the IBM company is not monopolize the market, does not appear to upstream manufacturers to downstream manufacturers control of the situation.
From the principles of technology and system is indeed the case, but not necessarily in China, after all, China's computer industry in the national regulatory, production and PC computers require the approval of the State. Unlimited scientific and technological enterprises, we must let the country to cancel this approval system, at least let the country issued the production approval of the PC computer, so unlimited tech enterprises in order to establish a sound and control the middle and lower reaches of manufacturers to give computer makers more than three.
Not only for the interests of the company, unlimited scientific and technological enterprises need to find a number of computer makers in China, which was also considered for China's computer industry like IBM, COMPAQ, HP, DELL and other companies in the United States, they are less powerful rely on a Great Wall Computer Company will be able to compete with it? impossible thing! Therefore, we in China will